Friday, July 13, 2012

How Much College is too Much College?


Having attended college (many colleges), having watched my wife go through college, and having two kids in college, err….paying for two kids to go to college, I feel more than adequately qualified to speak on this topic. We get our college bound kids ready for college with 13 years of school prior to high school graduation and then send them off to college to select the education that will drive their future. This is where the insanity begins.

Once they arrive they have to complete the basic “Core” curriculum. For those who may not know, the core curriculum is made up of the same core classes these kids took in high school consisting of Math, English, Science, and other various classes. This is the problem I have with a typical college degree program. Why is it that a student majoring in English needs to take biology or geology? Likewise, why is it a student majoring in Geology needs to take British literature? Similarly, why does a student majoring in kinesiology need to take a class in philosophy or theatre?

Why? Well there seems to be a couple of reasons. One of them is to make a well-rounded student which is complete bunk as I never ever seen a high school coach whip their athletes into a no real frenzy by quoting Shakespeare of by philosophizing like Socrates. My personal favorite reason is the most overused line of all, “that’s the way it’s always been done.” But none of these are the real reason.

The real reason is that many people each year get degrees in English, Math, Theatre, Philosophy, Foreign Language, Humanities, PE, and other subjects for which that only real use for these degrees is in the realm of education. Therefore the only way to continue to secure these people jobs and to provide for a future generation of folks getting these degrees is to make them required torture for those looking for a degree in say engineering, medical fields, or electronics.

Now I’m not saying we should ignore those in the fields that make up the core curriculum. And I do believe that all college students should have to pass a qualifying course in basic English, basic math, and basic science; however, if a student passes a qualifying class then they shouldn’t have to sit through three or four more years of English, or math, or science, or philosophy. This would save students (and their parents) money and allow for two other alternatives.

The first alternative is that students could graduate earlier and then be allowed to take an internship to complete the degree. This would not only get the student the education he will actually need but it will provide them with real world experience before they are launched into the work force.

The second alternative would be for students to remain in school for the same amount of time they currently do, but they would have the opportunity to take more classes that pertain to their major. This would allow the students to be better educated in the job skills they are actually at college to learn.

Either way the students will be better educated in the major they are in school to pursue. Unfortunately we have a collegiate culture that is more about continuing the same traditional methods we have always used and not about what is actually better for the consumer, a consumer who is directly the student in this case and indirectly the work force in which they will be going out into after their time in academia is over.

It’s amazing that we have been able to streamline and improve most everything in our lives, but when it comes to a good college education somehow we have managed to leave that process back in the early 1900s. Unfortunately, the decisions over this sort of qualifying process are made by the very same people who benifet from the system being stuck where it is.

Maybe I need to create a college? Anybody got some land, money, buildings, books, teachers, and mascot they can spare?

I need to look at my degree plan!
Bill